Julia Avdeeva vs Madelief Hageman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does the second serve performance compare? Recently, Avdeeva has a better second serve win rate at 44.84%, compared to Hageman's 39.02%. This indicates an edge for Avdeeva in maintaining longer rallies.
• Who is stronger in return games? Hageman shows a slight advantage in first serve returns, winning 38.01% compared to Avdeeva's 31.47%, which might be significant in breaking serves.
• What about dealing with pressure? Avdeeva excels here, saving breakpoints 55.15% of the time, while Hageman saves 47.77%. This suggests Avdeeva is more resilient under pressure.
• Looking at overall match performance, Avdeeva has a better win rate, securing 56.25% of matches versus Hageman's 50%. This trend favors Avdeeva in match outcomes.
• Which surface is preferred? Both players perform best on clay, but Avdeeva’s clay win rate is higher at 61% compared to Hageman’s 52%, hinting she may dominate on this surface.
• Examining event levels, Avdeeva competes at higher-level tournaments and has a better win rate of 56.25% at these levels compared to Hageman's 45.83% at lower-level events.
• When it comes to opponent quality, both players face similar competition, but Avdeeva tends to outperform against stronger opponents.
• Who performs better in deciding sets? Avdeeva again leads, winning 54% of deciding sets, while Hageman wins only 43%, which could matter if the match is closely contested.
• Regarding break point conversion, Hageman slightly leads with 43.39% compared to Avdeeva’s 42.37%. This could be crucial in pressuring the opponent's serve.

Editorial Prediction (August 27, 2025, UTC):

The second serve and return game statistics suggest Avdeeva holds a slight edge, as her performance in these areas provides a foundation for controlling points and matches. Combined with her resilience under pressure, she appears adept at saving breakpoints.

Although Hageman shows strength in converting breakpoints and performing in first serve returns, Avdeeva's overall match win percentage and higher tournament level experience imply a competence that often translates to match victories.

As both players favor clay, Avdeeva's superior win percentage on this surface further cements her advantageous position. Additionally, her ability to win deciding sets might play a critical role should the match go the distance.

Based on these cumulative insights, Avdeeva seems more likely to clinch victory in the upcoming match, given her comprehensive strength across these key performance areas.